SOC 2 Certification in Australia

SOC 2 reports are requested in Australia across a broad range of commercial and regulatory contexts. Vendor due diligence processes conducted by Australian enterprises, government agencies, and financial institutions routinely include requests for current SOC 2 Type II reports as part of third-party risk assessment frameworks. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) CPS 234 standard, which governs information security in APRA-regulated entities, requires regulated institutions to assess the security capabilities of third-party service providers — a requirement that SOC 2 attestation directly addresses.

SOC 2 audit engagements in Australia are frequently initiated in response to specific commercial requirements. Technology companies headquartered in Sydney and Melbourne that sell into the US market face customer security review processes that explicitly require SOC 2 Type II reports. Similarly, Australian data centre operators and cloud service providers serving regulated financial services clients must demonstrate control effectiveness through independent attestation rather than self-assessment. The continued growth of Australian SaaS companies targeting enterprise clients in North America and Europe has accelerated demand for SOC 2 Certification in Australia across the technology sector.

Regulatory and Procurement Context in Australia

Australian organisations operating in regulated sectors face overlapping obligations from the Privacy Act 1988, the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018, and sector-specific guidance from APRA, ASIC, and the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC). While none of these frameworks mandate SOC 2 certification directly, the evidentiary requirements they establish — particularly around third-party due diligence and control documentation — are substantially addressed through a current SOC 2 Type II report. For organisations subject to APRA CPS 234, a SOC 2 Type II report from key technology service providers serves as acceptable third-party assurance documentation.

SOC 2 compliance in Australia’s financial services sector is particularly influenced by ASIC’s expectations around operational resilience and outsourcing risk management. Financial services licensees that rely on third-party platforms for core transaction processing, customer data management, or regulatory reporting are expected to obtain and review independent assurance reports from those providers. SOC 2 attestation, issued by a Licensed CPA Firm, provides the level of independent verification that satisfies these expectations and supports regulatory examination responses.

Sectors Driving SOC 2 Demand Across Australian Cities

SOC 2 audit engagements in Sydney are concentrated among financial technology firms, payments infrastructure providers, and enterprise SaaS companies headquartered in the Sydney CBD and surrounding technology precincts. Sydney’s position as Australia’s primary financial centre means that many SOC 2 engagements initiated here involve organisations with direct relationships to the Australian banking sector, requiring close attention to both security controls and availability criteria. SOC 2 Certification in Australia’s Melbourne market reflects the city’s strength in health technology, professional services technology, and scale-up SaaS platforms that have reached the enterprise sales stage and face inbound due diligence requests from institutional buyers.

Beyond the two major metropolitan markets, SOC 2 engagements are conducted across Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, and Canberra, reflecting the national scope of technology vendor relationships in Australia. Government-adjacent technology providers in Canberra face procurement requirements aligned with the Australian Government’s Information Security Manual (ISM), and SOC 2 reports are accepted as supporting evidence within these vendor assessment processes. Australian organisations with data centre operations across multiple states must ensure their SOC 2 scope definitions accurately reflect the geographic distribution of systems and personnel involved in delivering in-scope services.

International Market Access and SOC 2 Requirements

Australian technology companies seeking to enter or expand in the United States market face near-universal requirements for SOC 2 Type II reports during enterprise sales processes. US-based enterprise buyers — particularly in financial services, healthcare, and government contracting — treat SOC 2 Type II attestation as a baseline vendor qualification requirement. An Australian SaaS company without a current SOC 2 Type II report will typically fail vendor security questionnaire processes at US enterprise accounts, limiting access to high-value commercial opportunities. SOC 2 Certification in Australia therefore functions as a direct enabler of international market access for technology-led organisations.

SOC 2 certification requirements are defined by the AICPA Trust Services Criteria and shaped by the specific scope of each engagement. During a SOC 2 examination, the auditor evaluates whether the organisation’s controls satisfy the criteria applicable to the in-scope Trust Services Categories. Requirements span organisational, technical, and operational domains and must be evidenced through documentation, configuration records, access logs, and other audit-relevant artefacts.

SOC 2 compliance requires organisations to establish and maintain a defined control environment. This includes board or executive-level accountability for information security, a documented security policy framework approved at an appropriate governance level, defined roles and responsibilities for control ownership, and evidence that policies are communicated to relevant personnel. For Australian organisations, governance documentation must reflect the organisational structure as it actually operates — not an idealised representation — because auditors will test alignment between documented responsibilities and observed control execution.

Vendor and third-party management requirements under the Trust Services Criteria require organisations to maintain inventories of third-party service providers relevant to in-scope systems, assess the security posture of those providers, and obtain assurance documentation — such as their own SOC 2 reports — where applicable. Australian organisations operating in multi-cloud environments or using offshore development resources must demonstrate that their vendor management processes address the associated risks consistently with the criteria applicable to their engagement scope.

Technical requirements for SOC 2 certification centre on the implementation and documented operation of controls governing logical access, network security, encryption, monitoring, and incident response. Logical access controls must demonstrate that access to in-scope systems is provisioned based on defined business need, reviewed periodically, and promptly revoked upon personnel departure or role change. Multi-factor authentication requirements apply to administrative and privileged access to systems within the defined scope boundary. During the SOC 2 audit, auditors will examine access provisioning records, access review evidence, and termination checklists.

Network security requirements include documentation of network segmentation architecture, firewall rule management processes, vulnerability management programmes, and penetration testing results. Australian organisations operating in cloud environments — predominantly AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform in the Australian market — must ensure that cloud-native security configurations are documented and aligned with the applicable Trust Services Criteria. Infrastructure-as-code environments require controls around change management and configuration drift detection to satisfy auditor requirements for SOC 2 attestation.

Operational requirements for SOC 2 compliance encompass change management, incident management, business continuity, and backup and recovery processes. Change management controls must demonstrate that modifications to in-scope systems — including application code deployments, infrastructure changes, and configuration updates — are authorised, tested, and documented before implementation. Australian organisations with continuous deployment pipelines must ensure that automated deployment processes incorporate appropriate approval gates and that deployment records are retained as audit evidence.

• ✓Security policy framework documented and approved at governance level
• ✓Logical access provisioning, review, and revocation controls with evidence
• ✓Multi-factor authentication for privileged and administrative access
• ✓Network segmentation and firewall rule management documentation
• ✓Vulnerability management programme with defined remediation timelines
• ✓Penetration testing conducted at defined intervals with results reviewed
• ✓Change management process with authorisation and testing requirements
• ✓Incident response plan with defined escalation paths and response timelines
• ✓Business continuity and disaster recovery plans with documented testing
• ✓Backup and recovery controls with verified restoration testing records
• ✓Vendor management inventory and third-party assurance documentation
• ✓Monitoring and alerting for security events with defined response procedures

• ✓Organisational and Governance Requirements
• ✓Technical Control Requirements
• ✓Operational and Process Requirements

The SOC 2 audit process in Australia follows a structured sequence of stages defined by AICPA attestation standards. Each stage produces documented outputs that form part of the final audit file and inform the auditor’s opinion. Understanding the process enables organisations to prepare effectively and ensures that engagement timelines reflect the actual work required at each stage.

The SOC 2 audit process begins with scope definition, during which the service organisation and the auditor establish the boundaries of the in-scope system. The system description — a management-prepared document — identifies the services provided, the infrastructure components, software, personnel, procedures, and data relevant to the defined scope. Australian organisations with complex system architectures, including multi-region cloud deployments or hybrid on-premises and cloud environments, must ensure that the system description accurately reflects all components that contribute to the delivery of in-scope services.

Scope definition also involves selecting the applicable Trust Services Criteria. All SOC 2 engagements include the Security criterion. Organisations that make availability commitments to customers include the Availability criterion. Those handling data on behalf of clients under confidentiality obligations include the Confidentiality criterion. Organisations subject to the Australian Privacy Principles or processing personal data of individuals may include the Privacy criterion. The Processing Integrity criterion applies to organisations whose services involve transaction processing where accuracy and completeness are commitments made to customers.

Following scope definition, the auditor develops an audit programme specifying the controls to be evaluated, the testing procedures to be applied, and the evidence to be collected. The audit programme is structured around the applicable Trust Services Criteria and reflects the specific control environment of the organisation. For Type II engagements, the audit programme includes sampling parameters for controls that operate continuously throughout the observation period — such as access reviews, change management approvals, and monitoring alerts — as well as inspection procedures for controls that operate at defined intervals.

Evidence planning involves identifying the types of evidence that will be collected to support each control evaluation. In a SOC 2 audit, evidence includes system-generated logs, configuration screenshots, policy documents, procedure records, approval records, and interview notes. Australian organisations must ensure that their systems retain audit-relevant evidence for the duration of the observation period and that evidence can be extracted in formats accessible to the auditor. Evidence retention policies should align with the audit programme requirements established during this stage.

Control testing is the core activity of the SOC 2 audit. Auditors apply inquiry, observation, inspection, and reperformance procedures to evaluate whether controls meet the applicable Trust Services Criteria. For Type I engagements, testing focuses on the design adequacy of controls as of the report date. For Type II engagements, testing extends across the full observation period and requires auditors to examine evidence of control operation at multiple points in time. Australian organisations should expect auditors to request specific evidence items for each tested control and to follow up where evidence is incomplete or inconsistent.

During a SOC 2 Type II audit in Australia, the observation period typically spans six to twelve months. Auditors select samples from the full period for controls that operate continuously — for example, reviewing a sample of access provisioning tickets, change management records, or security monitoring alerts from across the observation window. Controls that operated for only part of the observation period due to implementation timing are noted in the report and may affect the auditor’s opinion depending on their significance.

Where auditors identify control deficiencies — instances where controls did not operate as described or did not meet the applicable criterion — these are documented as exceptions in the audit report. The organisation reviews identified exceptions and may provide explanations or context as part of the management response process. Exceptions do not automatically result in an adverse opinion; auditors assess the nature, frequency, and impact of exceptions in forming their overall opinion on control effectiveness. Australian organisations should maintain open communication with the audit team throughout the testing phase to address potential exceptions promptly.

Upon completion of testing and resolution of open items, the auditor issues the SOC 2 attestation report. The report includes the independent service auditor’s report containing the auditor’s opinion, the management-prepared system description, the management assertion, and — for Type II reports — the description of tests performed and results. The SOC 2 attestation is signed by the Licensed CPA Firm and constitutes the formal output of the engagement. Australian organisations typically share the report under non-disclosure agreements with customers, prospects, and counterparties who require it for vendor due diligence.

1. Scope Definition: Establish system boundaries, in-scope services, infrastructure, and applicable Trust Services Criteria
2. System Description Preparation: Management prepares the written description of the in-scope system and its controls
3. Audit Programme Development: Auditor develops testing procedures tailored to the defined scope and criteria
4. Evidence Collection Planning: Identify evidence types, retention requirements, and extraction methods for each control
5. Control Design Evaluation: Auditor assesses whether controls are suitably designed to meet applicable criteria
6. Operating Effectiveness Testing (Type II): Auditor tests evidence of control operation across the full observation period
7. Exception Identification and Review: Auditors document exceptions; organisation reviews and responds as applicable
8. Report Drafting and Quality Review: Audit report drafted, internally reviewed, and subject to peer review requirements
9. SOC 2 Attestation Issuance: Licensed CPA Firm issues the signed attestation report for distribution

• ✓Stage 1: Scope Definition and System Description
• ✓Stage 2: Audit Programme Determination and Evidence Planning
• ✓Stage 3: Control Testing and Evidence Collection
• ✓Stage 4: Nonconformity Review and Management Response
• ✓Stage 5: Report Issuance and SOC 2 Attestation

The cost of SOC 2 Certification in Australia varies based on the report type, the number of Trust Services Criteria included in scope, the complexity of the in-scope system, the number of in-scope services and locations, and the length of the observation period for Type II engagements. SOC 2 engagement fees reflect the audit effort required to complete the examination in accordance with AICPA attestation standards and are not fixed-rate offerings.

Factors Determining SOC 2 Engagement Fees

SOC 2 engagement fees in Australia are determined by the audit effort required at each stage of the examination. Type I engagements require fewer audit hours than Type II engagements because they do not involve operating effectiveness testing across an observation period. Type II engagements with twelve-month observation periods require greater sampling effort than those with six-month periods, reflecting the larger population of evidence from which samples are drawn. Organisations with more complex system architectures — including multiple cloud platforms, numerous application components, or geographically distributed infrastructure — require more extensive testing and correspondingly greater audit effort.

The number of applicable Trust Services Criteria also affects engagement scope and cost. An engagement limited to the Security criterion involves fewer control domains than one that also includes Availability, Confidentiality, and Privacy. Each additional criterion introduces additional control areas that must be documented, evaluated, and tested. Australian organisations in the healthcare technology sector, for example, commonly include the Privacy criterion given their obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. This adds assessment scope beyond what a Security-only SOC 2 audit would require.

Investment Context for Australian Organisations

For Australian technology companies, the investment in SOC 2 certification should be evaluated in the context of the commercial outcomes it enables. Enterprise sales processes that require SOC 2 Type II reports represent contract values that routinely exceed the cost of the engagement by significant multiples. A technology company that secures a single enterprise contract previously stalled due to the absence of a SOC 2 report will typically recover the full cost of the engagement from that single commercial outcome. This cost-benefit relationship is well understood by Australian SaaS founders and CFOs who have navigated enterprise sales processes in the US and UK markets.

SOC 2 Certification in Australia provides documented, independently verified assurance over an organisation’s controls related to data security, system reliability, and information handling. The benefits of SOC 2 attestation extend across commercial, operational, and regulatory dimensions. They accrue to organisations across all stages of growth — from scale-up technology companies entering enterprise sales processes to established managed service providers maintaining existing customer relationships.

The most immediate commercial benefit of SOC 2 certification is the acceleration of enterprise sales cycles. Australian technology companies that hold a current SOC 2 Type II report enter vendor security review processes with substantive evidence already prepared. Rather than responding to individual security questionnaires — a process that can consume weeks of internal resource — organisations can share the SOC 2 report as a comprehensive response to the majority of vendor assessment requirements. This reduces time-to-close on enterprise deals and enables sales teams to focus on commercial rather than compliance conversations.

SOC2 Certification also expands the addressable market for Australian technology vendors. Enterprise segments that require SOC 2 attestation — including US financial services, US healthcare, US government contractors, and many large enterprises across all sectors — become accessible only once a current report is available. SOC 2 Certification in Australia therefore represents a market access requirement for organisations pursuing international growth, not merely a compliance exercise. The report enables participation in tenders, RFP processes, and vendor panels that would otherwise exclude the organisation on security grounds.

The SOC 2 audit process requires organisations to systematically document, implement, and evidence their security controls. This process produces operational improvements that persist beyond the audit itself. Organisations that complete a SOC 2 engagement typically emerge with more comprehensive access control processes, more rigorous change management procedures, more consistent incident response practices, and better-documented vendor management frameworks. These improvements reduce operational risk and strengthen the organisation’s overall security posture independently of the commercial benefits of holding the report.

For Australian organisations subject to mandatory data breach notification requirements under the Privacy Act 1988 — specifically the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme — the controls established to support SOC 2 compliance also strengthen the detection and response capabilities that determine breach outcomes. Organisations with well-documented monitoring, alerting, and incident response processes are better positioned to detect breaches promptly, contain their impact, and meet notification timelines. This reduces both regulatory exposure and reputational damage.

SOC 2 attestation provides Australian organisations with documented evidence that supports contractual representations made to customers regarding data security and system reliability. Many enterprise contracts include representations about security controls backed by the SOC 2 report as the primary evidentiary document. Holding a current SOC 2 Type II report strengthens an organisation’s position in customer contract negotiations and reduces the frequency and scope of customer-initiated security audits, which are resource-intensive to manage.

• ✓Accelerated enterprise vendor qualification processes with substantive pre-prepared evidence
• ✓Expanded addressable market including US, UK, and regulated Asia-Pacific enterprise segments
• ✓Reduced vendor security questionnaire burden through report-based disclosure
• ✓Documented control effectiveness supporting contractual representations to customers
• ✓Strengthened data breach detection and response capabilities under the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme
• ✓Improved internal security processes arising from systematic control documentation requirements
• ✓Competitive differentiation in procurement processes where multiple vendors are assessed
• ✓Third-party validation supporting investor due diligence and M&A processes
• ✓Reduced frequency and scope of customer-initiated security audits
• ✓Alignment with APRA CPS 234 third-party assurance expectations for regulated sector clients

• ✓Commercial and Sales Benefits
• ✓Operational and Risk Management Benefits
• ✓Customer Trust and Contractual Benefits

SOC 2 Certification in Australia is obtained by engaging a Licensed CPA Firm to conduct a SOC 2 examination under AICPA attestation standards. The process begins with selecting the applicable Trust Services Criteria, defining the system scope, and determining whether a Type I or Type II engagement is appropriate given the organisation’s objectives and customer requirements. The following stages describe how Australian organisations progress through the SOC 2 certification process.

Selecting the Right Trust Services Criteria

The first substantive decision in pursuing SOC 2 certification is selecting the applicable Trust Services Criteria. The Security criterion is mandatory and forms the foundation of every SOC 2 engagement. Australian organisations should assess which additional criteria are relevant based on the nature of their services, the commitments made to customers, and the specific concerns of the customers requesting the report. Organisations providing cloud-hosted services with availability SLAs will typically include the Availability criterion. Those handling client data under confidentiality provisions will include Confidentiality. Those processing personal information under the Australian Privacy Principles should consider including the Privacy criterion.

Selecting more criteria than are relevant to the organisation’s services increases audit scope and cost without necessarily increasing the report’s value to customers. Conversely, excluding criteria that are relevant to customer concerns can result in reports that do not satisfy the due diligence requirements of key accounts. Australian organisations should determine criterion selection in consultation with the auditor and informed by a review of the security questionnaires and contractual requirements received from existing and target customers.

Defining Scope and Preparing the System Description

Scope definition requires the organisation to identify which services, systems, and processes are included in the examination. The scope boundary determines which controls are evaluated and which infrastructure components are subject to testing. An overly broad scope increases audit complexity; an overly narrow scope may not satisfy the due diligence requirements of customers who need assurance over specific services. Australian organisations must ensure that the scope definition accurately reflects the systems used to deliver the services covered by the report and that subservice organisations — third-party providers whose services are relied upon — are appropriately addressed.

Engaging a Licensed CPA Firm

SOC 2 examinations must be conducted by a Licensed CPA Firm registered under the AICPA peer review programme. This requirement distinguishes SOC 2 from other security frameworks where assessments may be conducted by non-CPA firms or internal teams. Australian organisations should verify that the firm engaged to conduct their SOC 2 audit holds appropriate CPA licensure and is subject to peer review requirements. The peer review process provides an independent quality check on the firm’s audit practices and is a prerequisite for issuing SOC 2 attestation reports that will be accepted by sophisticated enterprise buyers and regulated industry counterparties.

CertPro conducts SOC 2 examinations as a Licensed CPA Firm operating under AICPA attestation standards. Engagements covering SOC 2 Certification in Australia are structured to reflect the operational and regulatory environment specific to Australian service organisations, including applicable privacy legislation, sector-specific regulatory guidance, and the commercial context in which Australian technology companies operate. All CertPro SOC 2 engagements are subject to peer review requirements consistent with AICPA standards.

CertPro performs SOC 2 examinations as a Licensed CPA Firm under AICPA attestation standards. SOC 2 audit engagements in Australia conducted by CertPro cover both Type I and Type II assessments across all five Trust Services Criteria. Each engagement is structured to reflect the specific system, services, and control environment of the organisation under examination. All reports are subject to the peer review requirements applicable to licensed CPA firms conducting attestation engagements.

CertPro’s Engagement Structure

CertPro structures SOC 2 engagements around the AICPA Trust Services Criteria and the specific operating environment of each Australian organisation examined. The engagement begins with scope definition and system description review, proceeds through audit programme development and evidence collection, and concludes with report drafting, quality review, and attestation issuance. CertPro’s audit teams bring experience across Australian technology sectors — including financial technology, managed services, cloud infrastructure, health technology, and enterprise SaaS — enabling examination teams to understand the control environments they are evaluating in full context.

CertPro’s position as a Licensed CPA Firm means that SOC 2 attestation reports issued following examination carry the professional credibility and regulatory standing required by enterprise buyers and regulated industry clients in Australia and internationally. Organisations that receive CertPro SOC 2 reports can share them with customers, prospects, and institutional counterparties with confidence that the issuing firm meets all qualification requirements applicable to SOC 2 attestation engagements.

Peer Review and Quality Standards

CertPro’s SOC 2 engagements are subject to AICPA peer review requirements. The peer review programme requires participating CPA firms to submit their audit practices to independent review by qualified peer reviewers on a defined cycle. This programme provides an external quality check on the firm’s compliance with attestation standards and is a prerequisite for firms wishing to issue SOC 2 reports accepted by sophisticated enterprise counterparties. Australian organisations engaging CertPro for SOC 2 attestation benefit from this quality assurance structure, which supports the credibility and market acceptance of the reports issued.

Australian Sector Experience

CertPro’s SOC 2 audit engagements in Australia reflect practical experience across the sectors most commonly subject to SOC 2 due diligence. Australian financial technology companies, payments infrastructure operators, cloud service providers, managed security service providers, and health technology platforms have each engaged CertPro for SOC 2 Certification in Australia. This sector experience informs the audit programme design and evidence evaluation approach applied during each engagement, ensuring that audit procedures are appropriate for the specific control environments encountered in Australian technology organisations.

SOC 2 compliance is not a one-time achievement. Maintaining SOC 2 Certification in Australia requires ongoing operation of controls throughout each annual observation period, systematic evidence collection, and annual re-engagement of the Licensed CPA Firm for the next Type II examination cycle. Organisations that treat SOC 2 as a continuous operational programme — rather than a periodic project — maintain stronger control environments and experience smoother annual audit processes.

Continuous Control Operation and Evidence Retention

The defining characteristic of SOC 2 Type II compliance is that controls must operate consistently throughout the observation period — not merely at the time of the SOC 2 audit. Australian organisations maintaining SOC 2 compliance must ensure that access reviews are conducted at defined intervals throughout the year, that change management approvals are documented for every qualifying change, that vulnerability scans and penetration tests are completed on schedule, and that monitoring alerts are investigated and resolved with appropriate documentation. Evidence of these activities must be retained and accessible for the duration of the observation period.

Evidence management is a common challenge in SOC 2 compliance programmes. Organisations that do not establish systematic evidence retention processes from the outset of the observation period frequently face evidence gaps when auditors begin requesting documentation. Australian organisations should implement evidence collection processes aligned with the audit programme established at the start of each engagement cycle. This ensures that evidence is collected, organised, and retained in a format accessible to the audit team throughout the examination process.

Managing Changes During the Observation Period

Australian technology organisations that undergo significant changes during a Type II observation period — such as major infrastructure migrations, system re-architecture, acquisition of new services, or significant personnel changes — must assess the impact of those changes on the SOC 2 scope and control environment. Changes that affect in-scope systems or controls must be reflected in the system description and may require the auditor to adjust testing procedures to account for the changed environment. Organisations should communicate significant changes to the audit team promptly so that the audit programme can be updated accordingly.

Annual Recertification Planning

Australian organisations maintaining SOC 2 certification on a continuous basis should initiate planning for the next annual engagement before the current observation period ends. Annual recertification engagements benefit from the established scope, system description, and audit programme of the previous cycle, which reduces the time required for engagement setup. However, changes to the system, personnel, or control environment since the previous engagement must be identified and reflected in the updated system description and audit programme. Organisations that plan annual recertification proactively avoid gaps in report coverage that would otherwise affect their ability to respond to customer due diligence requests.

SOC 2 Certification in Australia is conducted by CertPro as a Licensed CPA Firm operating under AICPA attestation standards. CertPro’s SOC 2 examinations cover Type I and Type II assessments across all five Trust Services Criteria, with scope defined to reflect the specific system, services, and control environment of each Australian organisation examined. All engagements are subject to peer review requirements consistent with AICPA standards, ensuring that SOC 2 attestation reports issued by CertPro carry the professional credibility required by enterprise buyers, regulated industry counterparties, and institutional clients in Australia and internationally.

SOC2 Certification through CertPro provides Australian organisations with an independently verified attestation that meets the assurance expectations of the most demanding enterprise procurement processes. The structured examination process — from scope definition through attestation issuance — is conducted in accordance with AICPA standards and reflects the regulatory and commercial environment applicable to Australian service organisations. Organisations seeking SOC 2 Certification in Australia are invited to contact CertPro to discuss engagement structure, applicable criteria, and timeline requirements specific to their operational environment.

• ✓Licensed CPA Firm conducting SOC 2 examinations under AICPA attestation standards
• ✓SOC 2 Type I and Type II assessments across all Trust Services Criteria
• ✓Engagements subject to AICPA peer review programme requirements
• ✓Scope defined to reflect Australian operational and regulatory environments
• ✓Experience across financial technology, managed services, cloud infrastructure, and health technology sectors
• ✓SOC 2 audit engagements for Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, and Canberra organisations
• ✓Annual recertification engagements supporting continuous SOC 2 compliance across Australia
• ✓SOC 2 attestation reports accepted by enterprise buyers and regulated industry counterparties globally